• Kecessa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why should she? No need to prove anything when she indirectly admitted that it was false by removing all references to being first Nation from her web site!

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The evidence presented is pretty damning anyway. I question whether it even matters at this point, though, given that a sovereign first nation has claimed her.

      • SheerDumbLuck@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s that same sovereign nation’s acting chief asking for a DNA test. It’s between them now.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It matters because pretending is basically a form of racism, she took home prizes and recognition that should have went to actual first Nation by birth artists, she saw the status as a mean to boost her career, that’s disgusting.

        • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it’s not great, but it’s up to the nations (or at least should be) to determine who’s one of their own. Imposing blood quantum is still not a great way to organise society.

          • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            And? I’ve never seen anyone anywhere argue otherwise. Even the original CBC article pointed that out pretty clearly.

            (Although I’ll point out the Piapot First Nation has recently come out to say her name isn’t on their membership role, so apparently the claims there are highly tenuous).

            The problem isn’t that Ms. St.-Marie claims to be native because she was adopted as an adult not a native community — it’s that she has claimed for decades that she was a 60s scoop survivor, born on a Canadian reservation and adopted by white parents — none of which is true. She’s changed her story about her heritage multiple times, at times claiming she knew and visited her indigenous birth mother regularly, and other ties (like now) claiming she doesn’t know who her indigenous birth mother is. She’s claimed to have been from multiple tribes — all before being adopted as an adult into the Piapot First Nation family.

            If I had been adopted as an adult by a black family, that wouldn’t give me the right to go around claiming I was a runaway slave from the pre-Civil War southern US, who came to Canada via the Underground Railroad. Ms. St.-Marie doesn’t (and shouldn’t) get a pass for her lies.

            She isn’t native by heritage — and that is what she’s been lying about for decades, and that is what people have a problem with. If she “feels” native by adult adoption she just had to say so, and not lie about her actual heritage for the last 50+ years.

          • Kecessa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            She didn’t say she had been adopted by them, she said she was born from first Nation parents and adopted into a white family!

            • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yep, and then she convinced a nation to adopt her back. It sounds like said nation might be reconsidering (based on other comments), but if they don’t she’s as native as the next person.

              I mean, if they wanted, it’s within the rights of a sovereign nation to literally sell citizenship to the highest bidder; Monaco does it. This case isn’t nearly that mercenary, but either way if we say self-governance we should walk the walk as well.

          • Kecessa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            One doesn’t exclude the other.

            • k_rol@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That could be true if this was also racist. The way I see it is she either idolized the First Nations and wanted to be one so much she made it up. Or she just saw an opportunity to make money and/or be more successful. If she thought First Nations were less than others she wouldn’t identify herself as such to gain something in society.

              If I’m racist I don’t want to be one of them or be closely associated to them, it could be shameful, disgusting or insulting.

              • Kecessa
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s true cultural appropriation we’re talking about here, not just dressing up but pretending to be one of them, she might not have thought of it or herself as racist or harmful to them, it doesn’t make it any less so.

                She basically stole two awards from first Nation communities at the 2018 Junos.

                If blackfaces is racism then I don’t know how you can pretend this isn’t.