Not if the government is imposing it on you. Not sure if you’ve ever read caselaw but if the
Oh no! The government is imposing rules requiring basic respect for co-workers on government employees! The horror!
Why are you talking about Trump? Trump has nothing to do with the conversation.
Trump is a fascist. He basically quotes Hitler. He is supported by neo nazis and KKK members. He has made countless racist statements about immigrants.
You keep saying the democrats are the fascists meanwhile the republican leader is the biggest fascist around.
Free speech is limited by the nature of the rules of lemm.ee. Since we are guests we must respect those rules.
You said people should be punished for expressing their 1st amendment rights. That they should be terminated as government workers for using their 1st amendment.
That is not what I said. If you can’t even accurately represent what I am saying, then you have no room to complain about who is posting in good faith.
think you’re also missing this is a bill for the government
I am aware.
You have no right to be called anything you want.
I never said otherwise.
You end up with people pushing back because it’s against their 1st amendment rights.
You get people pushing back because they’re bigots. Requiring basic respect for your peers is violation of your 1st amendment rights.
If one government employee verbally harrases another, saying “get back in the kitchen woman” to a female employee. They will be fired, and rightfully so. This is no different.
Oh no! The government is imposing rules requiring basic respect for co-workers on government employees! The horror!
Trump is a fascist. He basically quotes Hitler. He is supported by neo nazis and KKK members. He has made countless racist statements about immigrants.
You keep saying the democrats are the fascists meanwhile the republican leader is the biggest fascist around.
You’re almost there.
deleted by creator
Yet another example of how you like to be misleading. Nothing I said even slightly implied that.
Sure is. But this is irrelevant.
deleted by creator
That is not what I said. If you can’t even accurately represent what I am saying, then you have no room to complain about who is posting in good faith.
deleted by creator
This
And this are not equivalent. Basic respect for peers as a requirement for employment is not a violation of your first amendment rights.
deleted by creator
I do understand how it works.
I am aware.
I never said otherwise.
You get people pushing back because they’re bigots. Requiring basic respect for your peers is violation of your 1st amendment rights.
If one government employee verbally harrases another, saying “get back in the kitchen woman” to a female employee. They will be fired, and rightfully so. This is no different.