• const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    64
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tell me why “market share” of commerical, proprietary games is important to Linux again?

    • Mereo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because of Valve, Linux is finally my main OS. I’m a PC gamer and it was a pain in the ass to dual-boot between Windows and Linux.

    • andrew_bidlaw
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      These commercial, proprietary games are one of the things that pushes forward the capabilities of personal computers. They are unreasonable, unoptimized resource-hogs. If a Linux system is as capable of running them as a proprietary OS (that has a deck stacked in it’s favor), it means they lose one another advantage over Linux. And it also means that your hardware now is more productive at less bs tasks, especially consumer-grade nvidia cards, who are better supported now than years ago.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you are a Linux user and like commercial games, you probably would prefer them to work on Linux.

      “Market share” on Linux aligns the vested interest of game makers and Linux game players. If the company thinks it can make money, it will do more to allow games to run, or at least do less to stop them.

      • zingo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Starter edition - with no option of changing wallpaper and a 3 app multitask limitation.

        Proprietary telemetry built into the kernel.

        …Microsoft will die on that hill.

        ;)

        • CeeBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          What would be great is they’d likely need to open source certain stuff for it to play nice with the kernel. Stuff like DirectX. And if that happens it’ll be a singularity moment for Linux compatibility and adoption.

        • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Linux can be used to play commercial games > more people daily drive to linux > more companies port their software to linux > even more people switch to linux > Windows/macOS duopoly breaks, losing to open source alternatives

          I’m not saying playing call of duty on the deck will make windows fall, but it’s a start

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s high potential overlap between the profile of a PC gamer (who is often also a PC builder and general computing DIY hobbyist) and an OS like Linux that extends your tinkering ability massively on the software side.

      PC/laptop users are a shrinking demographic nowadays thanks to the advent of mobile devices, but they’re a high quality demographic made up of professionals and hobbyists with above average computer savvy. So lots of companies are trying to appeal to them because the choices they make in software and hardware can translate into many other IT fields.

    • Secret300
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Potentially more support for other things other than gaming, maybe… Hopefully

      • Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        nvidia openned their drivers not long after they announced that was “working sith valve to givd a better gaming experience on linux”

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what many people miss. I know Value is doing a lot but I was hoping for some other large companies to get into the space.

    • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of people only play games on their computer, hence running linux doesn’t make sense if they can’t play games on it

      • nous@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, a big excuse I used to see a lot was

        I would like to run Linux, but I want to game more so will stick to Windows

        And this has changed a lot with what valve has done which opens Linux to a much larger market of people that can now use it for their usecases.

      • sep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Now I wonder what the gaming share of linux use would be. Probably very very small percentage. since the wast majority of linux installs are servers

        • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I have at least 20 different devices that run some flavor of Linux. Servers, a laptop, TVs, AP/routers, probably more, if my other “smart” appliances run Linux also.

          Do Android phones and tablets count towards Linux gaming?

          PlayStations run a derivitive of BSD, maybe those should get honorable mention. ;)

          • sep@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Including phones would be significant. But in my (probably deranged) head android/linux is a different os from GNU/linux. The overlap of the kernel itself is not enough. In that case all switches/routers/storage appliances/toasters/washing machines/fridges/iot sensors often also run linux.