• nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember in college we took a course on economic efficiency and the short takeaway is “the free market is extremely efficient, but only when the competing parties start with equal resources. the more inequal the starting position, the less efficient the market becomes.” and to my mind that suggests that we should enforce some sort of “rubber-banding” effect so that a company needs to keep competing or else it will “drift” back to the mean over time. Something like aggressive taxes on the uber-rich and comprehensive welfare for the poor, y’know? Capitalism but with safety guards would be pretty cool.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something like aggressive taxes on the uber-rich and comprehensive welfare for the poor, y’know?

      This is why aggressive estate taxes are so incredibly critical. People shouldn’t be professional descendants. And of course welfare provides both ladder and safety net. The fools who are trying to abolish one or both are working against social mobility.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a reason why the European/Scandinavian economic model works so well.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think just don’t allow other companies to buy others. Mergers should be illegal.