boem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIBM releases first-ever 1,000-qubit quantum chipwww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up1474arrow-down111
arrow-up1463arrow-down1external-linkIBM releases first-ever 1,000-qubit quantum chipwww.nature.comboem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-square800XL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down1·1 year agobreaking encryption algorithms
minus-squareCorhen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down1·1 year agoFrom what i heard, even 1,000 qubits isn’t close to enough for modern passwords: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00017-0
minus-squareRin@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down1·1 year agoPaywall. Also, passwords and RSA are two different things.
minus-squareferretlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·1 year agoReversing hashing algos is what people mean when they talk about quantum computers cracking passwords / encryption, though.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoNo, they mean breaking RSA. The industry standard methods of storing passwords are resistant to QC attacks. Passwords could be broken while being passed between client and server under existing algorithms, but not the databases they’re stored in.
breaking encryption algorithms
From what i heard, even 1,000 qubits isn’t close to enough for modern passwords: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00017-0
Paywall. Also, passwords and RSA are two different things.
Reversing hashing algos is what people mean when they talk about quantum computers cracking passwords / encryption, though.
No, they mean breaking RSA. The industry standard methods of storing passwords are resistant to QC attacks. Passwords could be broken while being passed between client and server under existing algorithms, but not the databases they’re stored in.