• activistPnk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The rise of teleworking certainly doesn’t help. Quite backwards that instead of cooling one big well insulated office building you have companies sending everyone home where each individual worker heats & cools their (often uninsulated) home.

      • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Any city that still hasn’t got their shit together & built a cycling infra in the next ~5-10 yrs should be ghost-towned. Those cities are not participating in society. Nonetheless, the burden of a car commute on the environment is shadowed by the cost of heating and cooling a house for a full day.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Heating an cooling impact is incredibly dependent on location and season. Work-from-home is lower energy at least seasonally in a lot of places.

          • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The problem is corporations are happy to send people home all year round just to cut their own energy costs, esp. in the non-temperate climate periods when the collective on-site energy efficiency is most needed. That’s what the corporate bottom line dictates. Staff are happy to take that lifestyle at the cost of energy inefficiency. There’s no policy or mechanism anywhere to reverse that and discourage teleworking when the outdoor temp is outside temperate ranges.