• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So it’s really down to the question “do you trust them this time?”.

    No it isn’t. It’s whether you trust the studies or not. I do. You are suggesting there’s a huge conspiracy with the studies being faked. I’d need something more to believe in this conspiracy, not just your gut feeling.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was a 30 year legal battle to expose their conspiracy. It has already been proven. They lost in a court of law that exposed all of their nefarious activities. There are literally millions of documents you can review if you’re so motivated. So that’s why I say it’s up to you to choose if you believe they just completely changed their behavior and stopped engaging in that behavior or not.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are claiming they’re doing it again, since you’re claiming that all the new studies saying it’s non-toxic is faked. I don’t believe it. You do. I’m asking if you have anything concrete to show for it, same way as I asked if you have anything concrete to show about the claim of the toxicity.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It took a team of attorneys 30 years to expose them for who they are. How the heck would I have proof that they’re still doing it? No, I don’t have proof. I just don’t trust known liars. I understand your apprehension, especially in this age of conspiracy theories. But with DuPont it’s not a theory, at least not historically. Sure, maybe they went completely legitimate after being exposed. I’m going to assume they didn’t, since it’s risk free for me.