Mac@programming.dev to Software Gore@programming.dev · 1 year ago1080p Universeprogramming.devimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1219arrow-down11
arrow-up1218arrow-down1image1080p Universeprogramming.devMac@programming.dev to Software Gore@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareMac@programming.devOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up117·1 year agoTriggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agoLudicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.
Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
Ludicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.