• PsychedSy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was exactly my point. AI isn’t, though. All it can really do is respond.

      • kyle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sure the military is so excited about AI because of its ability to “respond”.

        • DriftinGrifter@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Im bot sure if you are aware but thats litterally what makes ai so usefull its just responding to external inputs and doesent habe to be programmed value for value because it getsTrained with datasets and chat GPT isn’t gonna hurt a fly the reason its m Rated is because the idiots who made it didn’t filter the input content whilst web scraping its litterally too stupid to Funktionass a weapon except for misinformation which it outputs regardless oft its age rating openai is just a buncha cucs who switched to a close source system and can’t actually make any gold company decisions

          TL;DR: Fuck openai

        • PsychedSy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you can get chatgpt to drive your murder drone I’d be very impressed. Telsa can’t figure it out in 2d.

          • kyle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            My brother in Christ, the AI revolution is more than chatgpt.

            • PsychedSy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Call when it gets dangerous enough to be an issue.

      • Socsa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        FWIW I work in the field and agree with this. LLMs in the current state are not so dangerous they can’t be released to public. Generative image and video models are a much bigger threat, but that was largely something which came from open source.

        If we really want to pearl clutch, it is NVIDIA which is really propping open this Pandora’s box in terms of putting the capability in irresponsible hands

        • PsychedSy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are the cards really powerful enough for so much fuss?

          • Socsa
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Definitely. An A100 system is around $10k which is expensive, but definitely in reach, and you need two of them to run a 70B parameter model. Possibly one if you are clever about it.

            And you can still do plenty of damage with a $1000 consumer grade GPU. Most deepfake videos are trained on these platforms.