Steal Wool@lemm.ee to Harry Potter@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoHPVPfile.gardenimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down111file-textcross-posted to: imageai
arrow-up110arrow-down1imageHPVPfile.gardenSteal Wool@lemm.ee to Harry Potter@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: imageai
minus-squareGabe Bell@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoTo cast a spell on something, you have to know there is something on which to cast the spell.
minus-squareTier 1 Build-A-Bear 🧸@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThe entire purpose of the spell revelio is to reveal things you didn’t know were there
minus-squareGabe Bell@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoNo – that makes no sense. If you don’t know something is there, how would you know you have to cast a spell to reveal it? Surely you can only cast a spell on something you know is there to make it visible, not on something you don’t know is there. Because if you don’t know it is there, how would you know it is there to cast a spell on it?
minus-squarethreelonmusketeerslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoI periodically cast Revelio throughout the day, just in case.
To cast a spell on something, you have to know there is something on which to cast the spell.
The entire purpose of the spell revelio is to reveal things you didn’t know were there
No – that makes no sense.
If you don’t know something is there, how would you know you have to cast a spell to reveal it?
Surely you can only cast a spell on something you know is there to make it visible, not on something you don’t know is there.
Because if you don’t know it is there, how would you know it is there to cast a spell on it?
I periodically cast Revelio throughout the day, just in case.