• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to examples because in both cases it’s things you can do without it being an interest to you, you do it out of convenience

    No, they’re things you have to do without it being an interest to you; you do it out of necessity.

    And that’s exactly my point: you have to know how to, if not “program,” at least chain functional components together into a workflow, if you are to be considered computer literate. IDGAF if you’re using Linux or not; that applies equally to folks using Windows or MacOS too. Just like how the concept of (regular) literacy requires being able to write, not just to read, the act of using a computer is inherently one of creation and synthesis. If you’re not doing that, you’re merely consuming content.

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t get the point at all…

      No, going biking around the lake on the weekend isn’t a necessity, driving your car instead of taking the bus isn’t a necessity and no I’m both cases you don’t need to understand the mechanical intricacies of the bike or car to do it. You’re over analysing for no reason.

      And no you don’t need to be computer savvy to use a computer if you use an OS that’s simple and automates tasks like updates and not everyone wants to understand computer enough to do those tasks manually, hence me pointing out Linux users spitting on people that aren’t good with computers while also saying that everyone should use Linux, which requires being good with computers.

      My 90 years old grandma got her first computer at 80 and she couldn’t tell you how to plug a mouse in it, it doesn’t prevent her from using it to check Facebook and get emails!