Mathematically they’re equivalent, but the feelings could not be further apart.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Something about the phrase “living to the fullest” doesn’t allude to sensible motorcycle safety precautions.

    • ratman150
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is an entire sub culture of motorcyclists that agree, I do not however condone riding without appropriate gear.

      • Sarcasmo220@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with that as well. I ride a cruiser and I wear a full face helmet, jacket, boots or shoes covering the ankles, and at least thick denim pants. Sometimes I think about getting a 3/4 helmet but I don’t think I could bring myself to do it.

        When I was real hardcore riding everyday I wore waterproof jacket, pants, and boots. Now I just don’t ride in the rain at all if I can help it.

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As one on an extended hiatus due to getting hit by an SUV and high-siding, I recommend only using a full face or highly rated modular with a good lock. I have a face because of my HJC modular and am not confident in anything without a chinbar.

          • ratman150
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve often wondered why people gravitate so much to quarter and even half helmets for this reason. They do protect your head better than nothing but also expose your face (in the case of a quarter helmet) to the ground.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I suspect that, for some, it is the misconcption that the visor limits field of view in a meaningful way. Might have been the case 40-50 years ago but seems a rarity with modern helmets.

              • ratman150
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Back on that site that sounded like read it I asked some of these people and it just boiled down to “because I can/freedumb”.

                • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ah yeah. I forget about that set of bikers often as I only associated with the ADV folks who are all about ATGATT. Really weird to me to think that people actually want to be PPE luddites and miss the chance to wear a modern suit of armor, without being out of place or violating the laws of some municipalities.

                  • ratman150
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah I never understood it myself. I once had a run in with one of those “hard ass types” while on a little virago 250 and they proceeded to lecture me on the ways of the roads…which was entirely just giving them right of way always no matter what. He was annoyed at me for passing him on a 250…in traffic.