• HM05@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good to see some coverage through The New York Times. While it still hasn’t been signed into law by the president, there doesn’t seem to be any suggestion that he’ll veto it. The current state of the amendment does make it easy for groups holding information on UAPs to retain that information. However, there are a lot of UAP incidents already greater than 25 years old that are known of publicly and more known by congress. This gives some power to force these groups to release some information and any potential resistance will likely spur future legislation to build on the current state of the law.