• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 months ago

    carbon offsets

    they are tge best market solution we have thus far yo the climate crisis

    Bullshit. Carbon offsets is mostly a scam where polluters “offset” real emissions with potential if not purely theoretical mitigation. The reforestation that companies claim offset their emissions would fill more land than there is on earth in total.

    Meanwhile, the fossil fuel industry, to name the worst problem humanity has, is emitting MORE than ever while using the Carbon Offsets scam to greenwash their killing millions of people a year while being the main cause of climate change.

    The best solution is, has always been and always will be to emit less pollutants.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      Literally all your complaints call for better regulation rather than abandonment of the carbon offset program… Such regulation being enabled by, you guessed it, high profile folks buying in!

      Yes, no emissions would be better but until we’re willing to chastise everyone for not eating vegan, it seems pretty silly to get annoyed for someone who contributes less to climate change than say, a mcdonalds.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Enough with the “your point is only valid if it’s 100% and mine’s valid if it’s 0.1%” bullshit.

        You just want to pretend that the scam is working and will work more if it’s expanded rather than do what every single scientist with expertise in relevant areas and without tons of conflicts of interest say is the only real solution.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Which one of your complaints wasn’t about how a carbon offset system should be implemented rather than the notion itself is bad?

          To say that it carbon offsets can be gamed and thus the entire system is awful is a little silly. It’s sort of like saying “too many people cheat on their taxes, we shouldn’t have taxes!” Instead of, y’know, better regulation and enforcement.

          In this case, you have one of the most PR savvy people on Earth, I’d be surprised if her team didn’t find a legit carbon offset (which is exactly how we say, compensate farmers for not burning the amazon for the lucrative farmland etc.)

          As for the only real solution, if you’ve been paying attention, you’ll note most of those scientists have for years suggested a carbon tax as a way to transition to net zero. Well, in the face of government inaction, carbon offsets are the free market filling the gap in the meantime. Are they imperfect? Absolutely! But are programs like this how we fund and develop the transition to net zero? Also absolutely!

          • SeducingCamel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The system is designed to be gamed, it’s working as intended. It’s a complete bullshit sham that isn’t doing a single thing for the climate