Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoRadioactivity detected in Fukushima worker's nosewww.japantimes.co.jpexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1102arrow-down121cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up181arrow-down1external-linkRadioactivity detected in Fukushima worker's nosewww.japantimes.co.jpLee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareBipta@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down3·11 months agoStill safer than fossil fuels.
minus-squareDiplomjodler@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down24·11 months agoTell that to the tens of thousands of people that were displaced. And the alternative to nukes is obviously not fossil fuels but renewable energy.
minus-squareleaskovski@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·11 months agoNukes? I’m sorry, but what?
minus-squaredalekcaan@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·11 months agoNuclear power as seen by someone who has no idea what nuclear power is.
minus-squareleaskovski@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·11 months agoI know what nuclear power is, I’m just confused as to why someone would use the word nukes, which is clearly associated with the ammunitions. Nuclear power has its place in the energy generation system alongside natural energy sources.
minus-squaredalekcaan@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoSorry if I was vague, I meant the person you were replying to doesn’t know what nuclear power is, which is why they use a fear mongering term like “nukes” to describe nuclear power.
minus-squaredangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down23·edit-211 months agoYour house is on fire, but the good news is I just saved a lot of money on my car insurance. The lesser of 2 evils is not a compelling argument for energy consumption when the Earth is dying.
Still safer than fossil fuels.
Tell that to the tens of thousands of people that were displaced. And the alternative to nukes is obviously not fossil fuels but renewable energy.
Nukes? I’m sorry, but what?
Nuclear power as seen by someone who has no idea what nuclear power is.
I know what nuclear power is, I’m just confused as to why someone would use the word nukes, which is clearly associated with the ammunitions.
Nuclear power has its place in the energy generation system alongside natural energy sources.
Sorry if I was vague, I meant the person you were replying to doesn’t know what nuclear power is, which is why they use a fear mongering term like “nukes” to describe nuclear power.
Ah, gotcha!
Your house is on fire, but the good news is I just saved a lot of money on my car insurance.
The lesser of 2 evils is not a compelling argument for energy consumption when the Earth is dying.
This is a piss poor take.