Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoRadioactivity detected in Fukushima worker's nosewww.japantimes.co.jpexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1102arrow-down121cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up181arrow-down1external-linkRadioactivity detected in Fukushima worker's nosewww.japantimes.co.jpLee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareBipta@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down3·1 year agoStill safer than fossil fuels.
minus-squareDiplomjodler@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down24·1 year agoTell that to the tens of thousands of people that were displaced. And the alternative to nukes is obviously not fossil fuels but renewable energy.
minus-squareleaskovski@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·1 year agoNukes? I’m sorry, but what?
minus-squaredalekcaan@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·1 year agoNuclear power as seen by someone who has no idea what nuclear power is.
minus-squareleaskovski@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoI know what nuclear power is, I’m just confused as to why someone would use the word nukes, which is clearly associated with the ammunitions. Nuclear power has its place in the energy generation system alongside natural energy sources.
minus-squaredalekcaan@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoSorry if I was vague, I meant the person you were replying to doesn’t know what nuclear power is, which is why they use a fear mongering term like “nukes” to describe nuclear power.
minus-squaredangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down23·edit-21 year agoYour house is on fire, but the good news is I just saved a lot of money on my car insurance. The lesser of 2 evils is not a compelling argument for energy consumption when the Earth is dying.
Still safer than fossil fuels.
Tell that to the tens of thousands of people that were displaced. And the alternative to nukes is obviously not fossil fuels but renewable energy.
Nukes? I’m sorry, but what?
Nuclear power as seen by someone who has no idea what nuclear power is.
I know what nuclear power is, I’m just confused as to why someone would use the word nukes, which is clearly associated with the ammunitions.
Nuclear power has its place in the energy generation system alongside natural energy sources.
Sorry if I was vague, I meant the person you were replying to doesn’t know what nuclear power is, which is why they use a fear mongering term like “nukes” to describe nuclear power.
Ah, gotcha!
Your house is on fire, but the good news is I just saved a lot of money on my car insurance.
The lesser of 2 evils is not a compelling argument for energy consumption when the Earth is dying.
This is a piss poor take.