efficiency will significantly depend on TDP, as the two Meteor Lake chips are only more efficient than the Ryzen 7 7840HS with a power consumption of 30 watts or more. At 15 watts, the Ryzen 7 7840HX was about 30% more efficient than the Core Ultra 7 155H, and that probably means Meteor Lake won’t be the processor of choice for handheld gaming PCs like the Steam Deck and ROG Ally.
Also we don’t yet know the next AMD mobile chip’s performance efficiency. Intel might have caught up, but AMD can still pull ahead.
What does excite me about Intel iGPU is their superior XeSS performance, which can help in both visual quality and battery life, but it still has to prove itself in laptop space first I guess.
Cool, so Intel based handhelds will start to be competitive with AMD?
efficiency will significantly depend on TDP, as the two Meteor Lake chips are only more efficient than the Ryzen 7 7840HS with a power consumption of 30 watts or more. At 15 watts, the Ryzen 7 7840HX was about 30% more efficient than the Core Ultra 7 155H, and that probably means Meteor Lake won’t be the processor of choice for handheld gaming PCs like the Steam Deck and ROG Ally.
Ah, makes sense. I guess it’ll be mostly NUCs and laptops then.
Also we don’t yet know the next AMD mobile chip’s performance efficiency. Intel might have caught up, but AMD can still pull ahead.
What does excite me about Intel iGPU is their superior XeSS performance, which can help in both visual quality and battery life, but it still has to prove itself in laptop space first I guess.
Id like to see the power consumption figures for benches