AI-screened eye pics diagnose childhood autism with 100% accuracy::undefined

  • dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would expect them to control for stuff like that, though.

    What was the problem with that male vs female deep-learning test a few years ago?

    That all the males were earlier in the day, so the sun angle in the background was a certain direction, while all the females were later in the day, so the sun was in a different angle? And so it turned out that the deep-learning AI was just trained on the window in the background?

    100% accuracy almost certainly means this kind of effect happened. No one gets perfect, all good tests should be at least a “little bit” shoddy.

    • eggymachus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely possible, but we’ll have to wait for some sort of replication (or lack of) to see, I guess.