• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The title could have meant, “Ads Urging Canadians to Oppose Climate Laws [That Were] Paid for by Gas Industry”.

    Given big industry buys laws all the time, I had to spend some time figuring it out and my first impression was the wrong one. I don’t think that’s great for a headline. We don’t have to save column inches anymore, we can have more descriptive headlines.

    From the article a clearer headline would read, “Ads Urging Canadians to Oppose Climate Laws [Were] Paid for by Gas Industry”. Or they could say, “Ads Paid for by Gas Industry Urge Canadians to Oppose Climate Laws”. That puts the industry’s lobbying right up front.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think the issue is that who paid for the ads wasn’t previously clear - the gas industry used a front group.

      • RooPappy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you see a lot of ads promoting any political point of view, you can usually assume that someone with entirely too much money is in favor of it, and you probably shouldn’t be.