• OneWomanCreamTeam
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Put bulls are not an objective bad for society. They’re not ruthless killing machines. They’re not even more aggressive than other dogs.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do they do anything that other dogs can’t do? Besides killing people. What’s the benefit of having pit bulls?

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But they are for more capable of killing/maiming and kill more often than other breeds.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any large breed dog is objectively more capable of killing a human. Pit bulls are just 20% of the US dog population and rottweilers are 2%.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yet it’s still almost never a Great Dane, Bernese, St Bernard, Mastiff, or a Newfoundland. Pitbulls are 20% of dogs, yet [this study found they make up 53% of dog bite injuries requiring ER treatment.]) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34100808/)

          The fact is, they are disproportionally more likely to case injury or death.