• Tetra@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “there are squillions of simulated universe.”

    Huge assumption there lol, but I guess I see your point. If you assume simulations of this scope and quality are possible (again HUGE assumption), then your odds of being in one go up a lot, obviously.

    Again though, at some point you have to hit actual, non simulated reality, and when everything seems to point towards that being the case for us, and absolutely nothing hints at a simulation, I don’t see why we couldn’t just be in that actual reality. I can’t help but see that thought experiment as just an attempt to answer “the big question” in some way, even though in actuality it just moves it out of view.

    It’s Russell’s teapot, impossible to disprove and theorically possible, but there’s nothing backing it up besides fantastical assumptions. In that regard yeah, I think the comparison with God is warranted. The creators of our simulation, and especially the ones up above that are actually real would need such absurd levels of technology so far beyond our comprehension that it would be magic to us, and they would absolutely be our Gods.

    I don’t see much of a difference, it’s kind of just a tech themed spin on it, with the same fallacies plaguing the whole concept, IMO. It’s cool to think and write scifi about, but that’s about it.

    • m0darn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huge assumption there lol, but I guess I see your point.

      It’s not an assumption, it’s a conclusion based on the premises laid out in the previous sentences.

      Everything seems to point towards that being the case for us, and absolutely nothing hints at a simulation

      Maximum speed, minimum length, light is only a particle when we’re looking at it…

      Like there are other things that definitely point away from it being a simulation (eg gravity waves). But there’s not nothing pointing towards simulation.

      • robotica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lmao why would gravity waves point away from the universe being a simulation? Also you put a comic strip as your source, you have less than zero credibility in anything.

        • m0darn@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lmao why would gravity waves point away from the universe being a simulation?

          Sorry what I meant is miniscule gravitational forces across billions of light years.

          Because of the ridiculous cost of calculating the force of gravity between every water molecule on neptune and carbon atom on exoplanet xjwhatever. Gravity waves suggest this is actually happening.

          Also you put a comic strip as your source, you have less than zero credibility in anything.

          What community are we in? I don’t actually believe simulation theory… it’s a concise explanation.