I know this is human nature and this is nothing new. It’s absolutely impossible to make something that everyone is happy with, but what’s the need to be so destructive?
I recently finished The Callisto Protocol and in my opinion it’s a great game but I remember people saying that “The game was so bad that they (Krafton) had to give it away (PS Plus) for someone to play it”.
Oddly enough I probably like to contradict most people because another game I’m interested in playing is Immortals of Aveum and when I read one or another review people say that “It’s just another generic dead game, like those generic trash Netflix series”, I mean, is it really necessary to be so destructive? And I want to clarify, I don’t give a shit what people say, if I like a game and I enjoy it I don’t mind paying full price for it, and if I don’t like it, I just don’t do destructive reviews.
What I least understand about the gaming community and what I find most toxic is when they criticize others for playing something they like, like the phenomenon of criticizing Genshin Impact players or in the past the same with Minecraft. Do I commit a sin by playing something I like?
competition? Sure…
“self improvement”, on the other hand? Not a snowball’s chance in hell, unless that’s what they call bigotry… 🤦♀️🤣🤣
I haven’t read the study but I’m assuming their point is they like to see number/medal go up in these games because that is where they have power in their life. So they are more willing to hit the trenches and just go deep into a game trying to get to grandmaster or diamond or some shit. I think that is what they mean about “self improvement”.