• S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    By unionization… The stronger the labour force is, the less they are able to get pushed around like this.

    • anon_water@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well yes. My question is how can we change union busting, because that’s what the article is about.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        By unionizing.

        To afford good lawyers in order to fight back, unions need money, which requires more members to pay union dues.

        To keep politicians honest and to credibly threaten their electibility, unions need more members that can be politically mobilized.

        It’s a feedback loop. The more people unionize, the more powerful unions become and the more powerful unions become, the more they can protect people who unionize.

        • ndguardian@lemmy.studio
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          1 year ago

          If all the employees are in a union, you can’t get rid of all the unions without getting rid of all the employees.