I often find myself explaining the same things in real life and online, so I recently started writing technical blog posts.

This one is about why it was a mistake to call 1024 bytes a kilobyte. It’s about a 20min read so thank you very much in advance if you find the time to read it.

Feedback is very much welcome. Thank you.

  • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Initially the SI prefixes were used and used 1024 instead of 1000

    Only CPUs and RAM use 1024. Floppy disks and hard drives going way back to the 1970’s used 1000. In software, both are used depending on the context (and also obviously depending on the software). Most modern operating systems use 1024 for RAM and 1000 for file sizes (in the early days of computing, that agreed upon approach didn’t exist, and it varied from one computer to the next).

    @smokin_shinoby’s tech school was shit. There has never been consistency on this issue and it’s really sad that they failed to teach both numbering systems as they are (and always were) widely used.

    • PsychedSy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fair on the floppy thing. I was too young to have worried about that.