• PizzaMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yeah, because billions of dollars just appear out of nowhere.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      What’s your point? That pizza hut saved up revenue and was able to buy back shares instead of refunding franchises so they could afford delivery drivers for a year?

        • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Your “greedy CEOs” rant has nothing to do with the current situation. The franchises which hire and pay the delivery drivers don’t have CEOs.

          How are Republicans being fascists in this situation?

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Don’t expect logic from the greedy people.

            I think it’s funny. It’s greedy for people to want to keep their money and not give it to them. It’s the other way around in my opinion.

            • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Back to my question you still can’t answer.

              How much money do you think pizza hut gets from its franchasises?

              The franchasises do not have CEOs they are LLCs they are single owned or partnerships and are not required to have CEOs.

      • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The money that went into the stock buy backs (paying the rich) came from the value created by the laborers, when it instead should have fairly gone to the laborers so they could have a living wage. The reason it hasn’t is greed.

        I’ve explained this multiple times now.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read. You just stated companies should be non-profits. That means they wouldn’t pay taxes, they couldn’t expand, they’d have no safety net. It isn’t greed to have a profit.