• Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I disagree, used products should get the OEM warranty just the same. The unit is the same age regardless.

      Theft is the big issue here. Steam should have the ability to blacklist units just the same as cellphones, but at the same time, buyers need to have the ability to check for theft at the time of purchase via serial number.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why? But regardless, the product was beyond warranty, and not getting warranty service on a stolen device is normal.

        Steam having the ability to blacklist devices massively compromises their value. The completely open nature of the device is a big part of what they advertised and how they sold it.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          You poor Americans. Product isn’t even 2 years out of release and you accept that as a decent lifespan for an electronic device like this.

          Likewise warranties exist to guarantee the quality of product, there’s no reason the company should be absolved from that simply because the user has changed.

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            11 months ago

            This is idiotic.

            The life span of the device is perfectly fine. There is no reason for or benefit to sending the device back to whatever random third party Valve wants to hire for service.

            It’s fucking stolen. There is no warranty.

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Being stolen is a seperate beast.

              You said “ But regardless, the product was beyond warranty” it wouldn’t be if you had proper consumer protections.

              • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                24
                ·
                11 months ago

                Our consumer protections are perfectly fine.

                The idea that buying a product obligates the company to service it until the end of time is deranged. The life span of any product is heavily dependent on how a user cares for it. Cars with a 5-10 year warranty will easily last 25 years if used reasonably, and easily die in less than their warranty length if you abuse them. If you required a 25 year warranty on cars because that’s how long they should last, the only outcome is that people who take care of their cars would have to pay more to subsidize idiots who break them.

                Every other product is identical. It’s not a coincidence that consumer electronics cost more in every country with “better consumer protection laws”, even accounting for your ridiculous tax rates. It’s because everyone is forced to pay extra, up front, to offset the costs of the people who aren’t willing to take proper care of their devices. That’s not better or better “value” to anyone.

                • Deceptichum@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  It’s completely ranged mate and it’s how the system operates in Australia. Would not be surprised to hear of similar from the kiwis, cannucks, or euro’s.

                  We require products to meet up with certain expectations, such as lasting a reasonable lifespan. No one in their right mind would buy a laptop or a console if they expected it to stop working after just one year.

                  And quickly comparing 2 tax calculators, I would be taking home less money in the US after taxes. I’m not sure how accurate the US one is, because their government doesn’t offer any such service themselves it seems so I had to trust a 3rd party site but I guess those taxes are going towards good things like the military and not useless things like improving citizens lives so that’s a small price to pay.

                  • LwL@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    EU is a general 2-year minimum warranty. Not sure if there are any product specific rules for longer warranty, but yea the US situation is insane.

                  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    16
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Your entirely unhinged laws are why everything costs twice as much there.

                    If the steam deck dies after a year, 99.9999999% of the time, it’s because of you. The lifespan of a mobile electronic device is almost entirely a product of how it is treated. The Deck is built like a tank and can take heavy abuse. Warranty service is not life span, and longer default warranties on consumer electronics literally always mean that responsible customers are charged extra, up front, to subsidize idiots.

                  • sugar_in_your_tea
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    IDK, I can’t remember the last time I actually used a warranty, and I know I have consciously decided not to on multiple occasions. It’s generally easier for me to repair something myself than to go through the warranty process, even if that process is smooth.

                    So I kind of get where the OP is coming from. At least in my perspective, the warranty needs to be just good enough that enough people exercise it so making good products is cheaper for the company than trying to scam people out of the warranty. Consumers pay for warranties through increased purchase prices, so the better and longer the warranty is, the more the product costs.

                    In general, I much prefer an easily repairable product to one with a comprehensive warranty, so I’d rather push for Right to Repair than better warranty coverage.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’re lucky it wasn’t just bricked remotely when reported.

      It’s honestly surprising they don’t do that

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They could probably blacklist it from getting SteamOS updates through their servers, but actually bricking it would involve taking away from the “it’s just a PC” nature of the device.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          TIL…

          I just assumed laptops would get bricked if reported stolen like a phone or console, but apparently they don’t?

          This actually makes a Steam Deck a huge target for theft

          • sugar_in_your_tea
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t know about you, but I’m really happy that Valve and PC manufacturers can’t just decide to lock me out whenever they want. After I buy it, it’s mine, not theirs, and I should be the one to decide whether to install a mechanism to brick it if it gets stolen.

            People still steal phones despite knowing that they’ll get bricked, they’re still worth something for parts.

            • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              With android the user can go to their Google account and remotely brick the phone themselves. But it’s you, the owner, doing the change, and I agree with it.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                On that grounds, Im sure you could write or find a program to give you the ability to remotely brick your steam deck when it next connects to the internet

                • sugar_in_your_tea
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Exactly. There are plenty of rootkits out there that can destroy the BIOS or something, and writing a way to run that remotely that would be pretty easy (just set up a cron job to check an online service periodically to see if it should brick itself).

                  However, I’d rather the thieves be able to use something they stole from me instead of just creating more ewaste. So I’m against the idea of remotely bricking things, especially for something like a gaming device where there is no personal information. For something like a phone, I just care that my personal data is safe, so I prefer a remote wipe to a remote brick.

                  I instead protect my stuff with physical measures instead of technical.

          • ratman150
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            11 months ago

            Some corporate computers have a way to do this via the bios but it must be preconfigured and can easily be turned off if it hasn’t been.

          • Captain Aggravated
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The onboard storage is a removable NVMe or eMMC memory module, it could be blanked or replaced.

            Amazing how quick people have gotten used to not owning their electronics.