Good news for android overall. Hopefully, this could be extended to other OEMs by 2025 and not be optional like virtual A&Bs when it arrives.

(Meanwhile, my current smartphone running 4.19… )

  • Grass
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    That sounds absolutely please no.

    • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Huh? Why not? Being able to stream multiple languages in a single cinema showing or supporting those with hearing difficulties is amazing.

      Even going to clubs and from the outside it looks like a bunch of weirdos dancing to themselves is amazing.

      • CaptKoala@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        This comment is hinged entirely on the assumption that a(more like many) for-profit business won’t immediately make it a money printer to make line go up, sure the tech may be amazing and huge for accessibility but I see it getting almost immediately milked like most other new technologies.

        • Daxtron2@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          So we should, what, stop coming up with new ideas because someone might use them for bad things? I guess we should stop making new kitchen knives because you could use them for murder?

          • CaptKoala@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, we should legislate (and then actually enforce that legislation).

            I really don’t see any other way to reign in the unchecked capitalism at this point.

            • Kushan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              What exactly should we be legislating here? We’re talking about an extension to existing technology that you’re already familiar with - Bluetooth - to allow a one-to-many relationship instead of one-to-one.

              There’s already plenty of legislation around incorrect use of radio spectrum, harvesting user data, etc. So what legislation are you referring to that’s missing?