According to SAG AFTRA, the deal will “enable Replica to engage SAG-AFTRA members under a fair, ethical agreement to safely create and license a digital replica of their voice. Licensed voices can be used in video game development and other interactive media projects from pre-production to final release.”

The deal reportedly includes minimum terms and the requirement for performers’ consent to use their voice for AI.

However, several prominent video game voice actors were quick to respond on X, specifically to a portion of the statement which claims the deal was approved by “affected members of the union’s voiceover performer community.”

Apex Legends voice actor Erika Ishii wrote: “Approved by… WHO exactly?? Was any one of the ‘affected members’ who signed off on this a working voice actor?”

  • Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m hoping this also means that voice actors can choose not to enter such a deal?

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not if they want a particular name, like Elias Toufexis seems pretty against having his voice cloned.

        • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s fine for people who are established, but unions are supposed to protect all members, especially the ones just getting started who don’t have as much bargaining power.

          • Dojan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Then everyone should unionise and fall under the same protections. It’s how it works here in Sweden.

    • arquebus_x@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It does, yes. And they can also choose to opt out of future uses of their voice in the AI trained model. Which essentially means that their contracts are on a per-project basis, rather than allowing the game developer to force them to contract for the current project and any future use of the model by that game dev.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The way I see it, if they want to train models on someone’s voice they should hire them specifically for that purpose. Ergo, clips that are used in production should not be used for training voice models.

        • arquebus_x@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The contract would be a combination contract, for performance and AI training. That’s explicitly the thing that’s been agreed to here.