squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 年前Film studios demand IP addresses of people who discussed piracy on Redditarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square230fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1external-linkFilm studios demand IP addresses of people who discussed piracy on Redditarstechnica.comsquirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 年前message-square230fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareAlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down5·1 年前The Constitution only protects you from the government.
minus-squareKuroeNekoDemonlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 年前Explain to me then how two US Federal District Judges upheld the first amendment during this entire fiasco with film studios
minus-squareAlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 年前Are you talking about Burstyn v. Wilson (1952)? Because that was about the state of New York attempting to censor a film. Not sure what case you’re referencing.
minus-squarepsud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Freedom of speech also means that individuals and companies cannot sue you for protected speech, cannot get your private data unless they have a very good reason
The Constitution only protects you from the government.
Explain to me then how two US Federal District Judges upheld the first amendment during this entire fiasco with film studios
Are you talking about Burstyn v. Wilson (1952)?
Because that was about the state of New York attempting to censor a film. Not sure what case you’re referencing.
Freedom of speech also means that individuals and companies cannot sue you for protected speech, cannot get your private data unless they have a very good reason