• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Sometimes, we must face reality. Newly developed safety features are a selling point and people do pay more for safer cars. If law dictated (and enforced) that all cars must have the exact same safety features, there would be no financial incentive to develop better safety, or much less incentive at least. In reality, car safety features are one of the few examples of things actually trickling down: today’s cheapest cars have safety features that at some point only existed in the most expensive luxury cars. This is fine.

      None of this applies to whatever the fuck the original post is about though.

      • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Sometimes, we must face reality.

        Why would I accept a reality that I think is fucked? No I am not gonna do that.

        None of this applies to whatever the fuck the original post is about though.

        Yeah but side tangents are fun.

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Why would I accept a reality that I think is fucked? No I am not gonna do that.

          I claim that this particular aspect of reality is actually fine, definitely acceptable and possibly even good. As I said, new/better car safety features do reach the cheapest models within a number years, making it a net good. Of all the things car companies do wrong, such as privacy, I really don’t think this is one of them.

          As for directly answering you, “Why would I accept a reality that I think is fucked?” – I think I’m misinterpreting you when I interpret that as you basically living outside of reality. That’s an option, I don’t think it’s a good one.