A second transgender candidate running for the majority Republican Ohio House could be disqualified from the ballot after omitting her former name on circulating petitions.

A second transgender candidate running for a seat in the Republican-majority Ohio House is at risk of being disqualified from the ballot after omitting her former name on circulating petitions.

The Mercer County Board of Elections is set to vote Thursday on whether Arienne Childrey, a Democrat from Auglaize County and one of four transgender individuals campaigning for the Legislature, is eligible to run after not disclosing her previous name, also known as her deadname, on her petition paperwork.

A little-used Ohio elections law, unfamiliar even to many state elections officials, mandates that candidates disclose any name changes in the last five years on their petitions paperwork, with exemptions for name changes due to marriage. But the law isn’t listed in the 33-page candidate requirement guide and there is no space on the petition paperwork to list any former names.

  • merc
    1·
    10 months ago

    The cisgender candidates… who didn’t change their names? How would that work exactly?

      • merc
        1·
        10 months ago

        The one where a bunch of people have had issues with the form? The one where 4 of them have been trans, but others have been cis? But, somehow people want to pretend it’s a law targeting trans people? Yep, I’ve been following it. I think you haven’t though. You’ve been off in your own world where the sky is yellow and your imagination leads the way.

          • merc
            1·
            10 months ago

            Nope, your reading comprehension is lacking.

            • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
              1·
              10 months ago

              I’m not the one making false and vaguely transphobic claims in a thread they apparently aren’t even following.

              • merc
                1·
                10 months ago

                Neither am I. But, you seem to have a problem with reading comprehension and logic so…

                • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
                  1·
                  10 months ago

                  I wouldn’t say I have a problem reading so much as you have a problem with trans people.

                  First you disagree the law is targeting, then you claim it does target, now you’re just responding with vague impunations.

                  • merc
                    1·
                    10 months ago

                    You like to live in a fantasy world, do you? Disregard logic and just accuse someone of having a problem with trans people when they simply explain a logical explanation that doesn’t require any malice?

                    You’re a pretty pathetic person, you should really take a hard look at your life.