Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer suggested that President Biden should talk about abortion more so people know he is a president who is “fighting” for the right to an abortion.

Asked by CBS News “Face the Nation” anchor Margaret Brennan if Biden, who is of Catholic faith, needs to talk about abortion more, Whitmer said, “I think it would be good if he did.”

“I know that one tenet of his belief system is that women and only women at — with their families and — and health care professionals are the ones who know what decision is right for them,” said Whitmer, co-chair for Biden’s reelection campaign. “And that he is fighting and going to continue to fight to make sure that that is squarely the ability … [of] an American woman to make that decision.”

Brennan then asked if Biden needs to be the messenger on that more, to which Whitmer said, “I don’t think it would hurt.”

  • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe they should protect them. Or do you forget when a Democrat created “Don’t ask, don’t tell”? If you think they’re innocent in all of this, you’re deluded. I just happen to be old enough to remember their sins.

    • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      DADT was a huge achievement for gay rights.

      I highly doubt you were old enough to remember or you wouldn’t be shitting on it

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ah, yes, I forgot how awesome dishonorable discharge was for vets that served their country. I forgot how many killed themselves after being outed, or fearing being outed.

        Sounds more like you don’t know what you’re talking about. I’m sure you think Bill Clinton did nothing wrong, too. I’ve never met an open and proud neo lib before. Gross stuff.

        • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Before DADT, the military would investigate suspected gay men like they were dangers to everyone around them. If you were a gay man, you couldn’t even go to a gay bar while off duty because you might be being followed by MPs out to catch you doing gay shit.

          DADT was a massive improvement and it doesn’t deserve to be shit on just because you think it should have gone further.

          • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            DADT welcomed more violence and forced victims to remain silent. You’re out of your mind on this one. The correct answer was to allow gay men and women to serve, without question and with The same protections all members of the military had.

            Carrying water for homophobic policies is exactly the type of nonsense I expect from apologists that don’t have their own standards or morals, though. I love it when this type of person jumps out from the woodwork to scold someone for actually having values worth standing up for.

            • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It was also repealed by a Democrat, don’t forget that.

              And I actually was serving while DADT was a thing. Most of us on the Enlisted side rolled our eyes at it, because we thought it was dumb af to even have it at all. None of us (in my circle of friends anyhow) cared who wanted to bone who so long as it was all consensual.

              I had a very close friend who was gay, and we served in Okinawa together. He actually came out TO his leadership to get his discharge because the mission over there was brutal on the workers (aircraft maintenance). Pretty much everyone knew he was, but leadership wouldn’t make a move to kick anyone out unless you were actively like “Hey, I’m gay” straight to their face. And when he told his First Sergeant, the guy was like “Airman _____, are you sure you want to be telling me this?” Basically giving him an out to rethink.

              He was a solid worker, just couldn’t handle it anymore. And he was not dishonorably discharged. It’s been a few years since I’ve heard from him, I should actually give him a holler and see what he’s up to.

              Anyhow, I say all that to be like, yes, DADT needed to be repealed, just like the trans ban needed to be repealed. But at the time, DADT really was setting the groundwork for many gay rights victories.

              • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                If you were actually serving, then you realize gay people were at extreme risk for being outed. Because if you were out that was considered telling which meant you were dishonorably discharged. So there was no relief from being caught by a fellow enlisted service person.

                Back in the '90s I was commuting to Virginia for work. We used to go out in a Navy town and see all kinds of shows. In this particular town. There’s a drag club that was very popular with some of the Navy guys, and wouldn’t you know it? Every once in awhile someone would show up and everyone would panic and run away. They were desperately afraid of being caught and found out. Don’t ask, don’t tell. Did not fix that problem in any way shape or form.

                The point we were originally talking about was protecting the right to abortion. Something that society has agreed for over 40 years should be a legal right, but nobody bothered to codify it in law. Just like the equal Rights amendment, it’s ignored until it can be used as a cudgel to force people to vote a certain way. If Democrats actually passed legalized abortion on a national level anytime the last 40 years, two things would be true. One, we would not be in this situation. And two, they wouldn’t have the ability to brow beat us against into electing shitty candidates just to eke out a win over other shittier candidates. Who knows, they might even put up a good candidate for once.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You mean that thing that happened because the white left didn’t vote and let Republican majorities in both houses happen?

      The white left and refusing to accept that the world won’t just do revolution without their doing even the sliverest minimum to participate in the direction of politics beyond bitching, name a more iconic duo!

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sorry, this has been going on for over four decades. You don’t get to just blanket, blame white left. It’s the entire Democratic party, from the states to the FED.