“There’s no way to get there without a breakthrough,” OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said, arguing that AI will soon need even more energy.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    You are right it isn’t very radioactive and a lot harder to control, not like I designed air scrubbers for 4 years of my life or something.

    The only reason most countries have a nuclear program is so they have nuclear weapons.

    Citation needed.

    A pity decades of OPEC propaganda has worked so well.

    • sizzler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ahh you’re not naive you are biased. Anything you say is effectively propaganda. Jog on.

        • sizzler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s a valid point in this case and I’m not attacking your character, I have respect for engineers/designers especially when it comes to reducing pollution. Rather I am attacking your position, which is not without bias, would you not agree on that?

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            If you mean that I am biased towards following evidence over feelings and like facts over propaganda then yes I am biased. Generally I am not convinced by “nuclear power bad because nukes bad and they are exactly the same according to a Jane Fonda movie I saw”.

            Nuclear power produces very little pollution and it is of manageable types. Once built it can pretty much outlast any energy source. It is very reliable and can produce energy at the same price for long periods of time. Renewables definitely have their uses and I would be happy if they displaced all fossil fuels.

            • sizzler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I totally agree with your second paragraph… but, I honestly worry about bad actors. We see it enough with war. I just don’t trust other people to not use the leftovers or to destroy the reactors to not create massive damage. It’s seemingly the nature of man.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Right except the kinda of plants that generate energy aren’t the kinds that are good at making atomic weapons. What about Germany and Finland? Both have a strong nuclear reactor program. Do you worry about them starting a nuclear war?

                I am more worried about soft power. Everyone knows nuclear war is suicide. You know what is not suicide? Using Twitter to break up the EU, hacking a server so you can embarrass a candidate you don’t want, funneling money to get the mafia connected candidate you want in. With about as much money as a small city budget has Russia managed all that. Nukes are so 1950s.