The weird thing here is that when you run these sources through one of those media bias websites, TRNN says ‘far left bias’, and The Hill says ‘slight left bias’. Are these bias sites blind; or am I just missing what having a ‘left bias’ means? Is there some far-left plan by whatever think tank to make me want to support this idea, which I very much do not support? An idea which usually falls under the ‘extreme right-wing’ category, no less? What the hell?
that’s the ‘crypto’ part. hidden. they pretend to be leftist yet always attack leftists and never corporate or right wing. disinformation artists and grifters.
That other person with the links likes to listen to weird conspiracy theories, particularly Jimmy Dore. Check the communities they moderate. I wouldn’t put too much thought into what they post and comment, tbh.
And they always act like they’re so enlightened and unfased when they get called out, it’s kind of eerie.
The problem is that you’re very partial to people who like to pedal conspiracy theories. It’s not the first time I’ve seen you link to questionable sources.
What I’m saying is, he continues to have a vested interest in disproving Russiagate. I’d be more interested in hearing what someone completely disconnected from Russia has to say about it.
Removed by mod
We watched him collude with Russia on national TV with our own eyes. Whatever links you have will never undo that.
Lol “Id like to push back by linking two youtube videos, one from the hill and the other from RNN.”
We only accept infowars and parler links as legitimate sources, sorry!
edit: And pornhub links!
fuck off with your cryptofash shit
The weird thing here is that when you run these sources through one of those media bias websites, TRNN says ‘far left bias’, and The Hill says ‘slight left bias’. Are these bias sites blind; or am I just missing what having a ‘left bias’ means? Is there some far-left plan by whatever think tank to make me want to support this idea, which I very much do not support? An idea which usually falls under the ‘extreme right-wing’ category, no less? What the hell?
that’s the ‘crypto’ part. hidden. they pretend to be leftist yet always attack leftists and never corporate or right wing. disinformation artists and grifters.
That other person with the links likes to listen to weird conspiracy theories, particularly Jimmy Dore. Check the communities they moderate. I wouldn’t put too much thought into what they post and comment, tbh.
And they always act like they’re so enlightened and unfased when they get called out, it’s kind of eerie.
I give you props for looking them up and checking the media bias websites!
Not sure what you are on about…
This is the internet, once in a while you may run into subjects you don’t agree with.
Many well-known and respected independent journalists have discussed this subject at length.
The problem is that you’re very partial to people who like to pedal conspiracy theories. It’s not the first time I’ve seen you link to questionable sources.
Attempts to de-bunk “Russiagate” with videos from a guy who literally works for Russia:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Hedges
Removed. Misinformation.
Seems people are stuck in the Red Scare/Cold War era…
Yes, he did work for RT America, below is an interview with DemocracyNow!, Amy Goodman.
Starts around 38:45.
“Disappeared”: Chris Hedges Responds to YouTube Deleting His 6-Year Archive of RT America Shows [59:02 | Apr 01 2022 | DemocracyNow!]
https://www.democracynow.org/2022/4/1/on_contact_chris_hedges_youtube_russia
What I’m saying is, he continues to have a vested interest in disproving Russiagate. I’d be more interested in hearing what someone completely disconnected from Russia has to say about it.
Ah, okay.
Only a few are that ou spoken, and they all get labeled far-right or russian asset.
Same as the whistleblowers, which are human with bias in them.
Pure garbage that undoubtedly references each other as “proof”.
45, and a large portion of the Republican conference is in pootie’s pocket.