• @kakes
    link
    English
    511 months ago

    Is there any actual information here other than the number 2 being added to the name?

    I gather it’s better optimized for Windows, which is a welcome enough improvement imo. Other than that, they just go on about how “safe” it is.
    I understand the concern about “AI safety” (at least in theory), but I wouldn’t exactly call it a selling point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      911 months ago

      Double the training data, double the trained context (4096 now), a chat tuned varient, the omission of the 35b model for now (it apparently isn’t “safe” enough), and commercial use is allowed (not that most of the people using llama cares about licensing).

      • @kakes
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        Thanks, that sounds more exciting than just “safety” haha.

    • @noneabove1182OPM
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      There’s a few things, one of the biggest is the commercial license and the 4k context

      • @kakes
        link
        English
        311 months ago

        Nice, thanks for the info!