HP CEO Says They Brick Printers That Use Third-Party Ink Because of … Hackers::The company says it wants to protect you from “viruses.” Experts are skeptical.

  • CodeName@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    What harm are they saying these “hackable” cartridges can even do? Brick the printers? So they are preemptively bricking the printers because… the hackers might… brick the printers? Makes sense! I expect better from corpo technobabble. This is just idiotic.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Site won’t let me read the article, but if I remember correctly from another one of these threads, they’re saying that a hacked cartridge could be used to load malware onto the computer itself. If true, the printer itself is hilariously insecure, as are the drivers they provide.

      • CodeName@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Right? Instead of bricking the printer they can make their software secure. But we all know the reality is they want to punish anyone who dares to buy third party ink which is why they ignore vulnerabilities, and probably created them in the first place. Just a sad state of affairs. Part of me wants to believe consumers and even corporations will rebel against this obvious BS, but they’ll probably make bank.

        • ironhydroxide
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not saying it’s correct, but it would be an interesting way to make sure the printer you installed ink in had “upgraded” firmware. Make the ink carry the firmware and flash when installed…