• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Are chats on snapchat public? Because if not, this is just an admission of automatically scanning and evaluating all communications on the app no?

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      10 months ago

      It was not immediately clear how UK authorities were alerted to the message, with the judge noting “they were not the subject of evidence in this trial”.

      A literal “We’re not the ones on trial here!” Holy shit.

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      Snapchat is not end-to-end encrypted, so they saw the message and notified the authorities. So yes, exactly.

      “Intercepted while the plane was over England through unknown reasons” my ass lmao.

    • can
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      No they are not. It was intended as a private joke among friends.

      It was not immediately clear how UK authorities were alerted to the message, with the judge noting “they were not the subject of evidence in this trial”.

      A spokesperson for Snapchat said the social media platform would not “comment on what’s happened in this individual case”.

      On its website, in a section titled “How We Work with Law Enforcement Authorities”, Snapchat says one of its goals is to “maintain a safe and fun environment where Snapchatters are free to express themselves and stay in touch with their real friends”.

      It adds: "We also work to proactively escalate to law enforcement any content appearing to involve imminent threats to life, such as school shooting threats, bomb threats and missing persons cases, and respond to law enforcement’s emergency requests for disclosure of data when law enforcement is handling a case involving an imminent threat to life.

      • nicetriangle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Also happened on airline WiFi presumably and I would guess that saying terrorist sounding shit over unencrypted channels on that sort of network is dumb as shit.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Is Snapchat not encrypted at all? If it’s encrypted between the phone and the server then it must have been intercepted at the server end, either by Snapchat or by the intelligence services. Or on the phone before encryption, by the OS, keyboard, or Snapchat app.

            • Verat
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              But arent client to server and end to end different? It sounded like he was talking about client to server like HTTPS or some such.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Thats not how that works. Even tho snapchat messages might not be e2ee they are still client to server encrypted. The operator of a wifi network can never see your message content, only which services you are using.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Uh Snapchat already does that. Nothing about it is encrypted. And deleted messages are only deleted from your device, not snapchats servers.

      • bisby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        But that wasnt the threat. They were going to stop him from blowing up the plane by… blowing up the plane.

        • Nommer
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          By blowing up the plane before it can blow up and whatever else it hits.

          • bisby@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            bluffing a threat to the plane by snapchatting your friend would be a weird move. No one on the plane even knew a “threat” was made.

            It seems like “we have no details at all about the threat (because it wasn’t actually credible), so let’s just be prepared for every situation” is the logic.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’d get a really big megaphone and tell the pilot “Pull over!”

      jk, they’ll just fire a Sidewinder missile at it if it deviates from its flight path.

    • Trollception@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Guessing it gives them information on what is actually happening on the plane. If the pilots were being held against their will they could be following orders from a hijacker.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    An airline passenger who prompted the Spanish air force to scramble fighter jets after he said he was going to blow up the plane he was on appeared Monday in court, the BBC reported.

    Aditya Verma was 18 when he and his friends traveled with easyJet from London Gatwick Airport to the Spanish island of Menorca in July 2022.

    The BBC reported that before departing, he told a friend on Snapchat: “On my way to blow up the plane (I’m a member of the Taliban).”

    Security services saw the message and flagged it to Spanish authorities, who sent two F-18 jets to follow the airliner until it landed, per the BBC.

    According to The Telegraph, Verma told the court he first thought the jets were flanking the plane as part of a military exercise related to the Russia-Ukraine war.

    Verma’s lawyer told the court it was a “bad joke” but emphasized it was one made in private with friends.


    The original article contains 281 words, the summary contains 159 words. Saved 43%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    How did they know the message came from him? Profile pic? Seems pretty work intensive (if it’s even possible) to connect a UUID to an IP address and search everyone’s phone for their UUID.