• ono@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’m not so sure.

    Unreal Engine can obviously handle some things well, but when I’ve seen it used for less common mechanics, the results have been mixed. For example, climbing and traversing uneven terrain are pretty bad in games like Palworld and Palia. Compare to the Breath of the Wild engine, which handles those things beautifully.

    It’s plausible that such mechanics were planned for this game, and that Unreal Engine made it difficult to get results that meet Blizzard’s standards.

      • ono@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’ll consider the possibility that the engine is blameless when I see two Unreal Engine games that do it well, hinting that it’s not unreasonably difficult. Sometimes a tool just doesn’t work well for certain uses. That could be due to a design that tries and fails, or one that doesn’t try at all and lacks a good foothold for a custom approach.

        In any case, my comment is not about one specific issue. Thus the words “for example”. The point is that what GGP said was obvious is in fact not obvious. Blizzard might very well have passed on that engine because of limitations they found, regardless of whether they detailed them publicly.

        • Daxtron2@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It doesn’t matter if you see it in games, it’s not a part of the engine. There’s no built in functionality for ledge grabbing and climbing, that is 100% game logic built on top of the engine.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Unreal Engine is open source, if there was something it couldn’t do then that could be rewritten so that it can do it

      • ono@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The decision of whether to modify software to suit one’s needs is often about the level effort required, both initially and for ongoing maintenance and support. Having permission to do it doesn’t magically make it worthwhile.

        And no, Unreal Engine is not open-source. (Which brings up another possible factor in Blizzard’s decision: Royalty payments.)

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          What do you mean it’s not open source?

          i have cloned their GitHub repo many times

          Also no it doesn’t bring up royalties because that isn’t related to source code

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Open source and free are different

              It can be considered open source because you can sell derivative engines (there are no royalties on that btw) and push upstream

              Under your source available link the inability to create derivatives is the common theme for what makes it not open source

                  • ono@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Unreal Engine checks all of those

                    No, I don’t believe it does. In particular, Section 4: “How You Can Share the Licensed Technology When It Isn’t Part of a Product” imposes restrictions that contradict the very first clause in the Open-Source definition: “Free Redistribution”.

                    At a quick glance, I expect the royalty requirements fail the first clause as well, but there’s no point in combing through them for this conversation, given the above.

                    You obviously want to believe otherwise, though, and I don’t want to argue with you. Feel free to test it in court. Good luck.