Maven (famous)@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 months agoRulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1635arrow-down10
arrow-up1635arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.worldMaven (famous)@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 months agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squareMaven (famous)@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·10 months agoI’m not convinced 100% isn’t shrunk in some way
minus-squareRiccosuave@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·10 months agoIt’s a beautiful and mysterious problem of mathematics. One that may change simply by observing the system. Charlie Kirk’s face size may be the key to understanding quantum mechanics.
minus-squarekey@lemmy.keychat.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·10 months agoSurely the real one is at least 106.
I’m not convinced 100% isn’t shrunk in some way
104% looks a lot more natural.
It’s a beautiful and mysterious problem of mathematics. One that may change simply by observing the system. Charlie Kirk’s face size may be the key to understanding quantum mechanics.
Surely the real one is at least 106.