• CountVon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    Newbies are often afraid or insulted to use “handicap” pieces

    I made this mistake! I started learning Go years and years ago, and it turned out the company where I was working at that time had a former 7-dan amateur player. When he found out I was learning he offered to play me, which I eagerly accepted. I didn’t know this at the time, but 7-dan amatuer is the highest Go ranking one can achieve in Japan without playing professionally (there are separate 1-dan through 9-dan ranks for pros). For our first game, he offered to give me the full 9-stone handicap since I was just starting out. I thought that sounded excessive and suggested a 6-stone handicap instead, so that’s what we did. He fucking destroyed me that game. It was not even remotely close. For the rematch, I humbly accepted the full 9-stone handicap.

    • Ashyr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Did those extra three stones make enough of a difference?

      • CountVon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well, he still won that second game but the outcome wasn’t as lopsided. It definitely made the game more interesting for both of us.

        • homura1650@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          No offense, but the extra stones just made it so he could go easy on you. When I started go, the new player challenge was to end a 9 stone handicap game against the resident 3-dan with a “positive” score. [0]

          [0] most official scoring methods either ignore captured stones, or count them as positive points for the player who captured them. However, when scoring by hand, it is easier to count them as negative points for the person who lost them; so thats what we did.