• Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The reason houses are expensive is because investment firms are buying them up with cash.

    There are entire neighborhoods owned by investment firms. A lot of these homes are empty and are just used to prop up housing costs.

    The issue isn’t supply, it’s policy. The issue is reckless monetary policy combined with banks/investment firms controlling the market.

    If you want cheaper housing building more isn’t the answer. The real answer is banning corporations from owning homes.

    • Piemanding
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve seen the idea thrown about to tax houses higher the more a single entity owns. IDK about the feasibility of that plan, but we need to do something. I feel like it would never happen, though, because rich people and, by extension, lawmakers own multiple homes and they wouldn’t want to lose money.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Taxes don’t mean shit to the wealthy. They will find a loophole to exploit and end up never paying taxes.

        Even still if they had to pay more taxes it’s nothing to them. They are swimming in money. It’s not even about the money at this point. They want to undercut the poor so the poor stay poor.

        • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Taxes don’t have to be to punish the wealthy from purchasing homes, it just has to be enough to make it so they can’t profit from it.

          If they can’t profit from buying homes, they won’t do it.

          If they can buy 10 houses and pay $2000 / year in property taxes per house to hold on to it, but the houses go up in value by $20k per year, they profit.

          If instead they pay $2k for the first, $4k for the second, $8k for the third, etc. there is no incentive for them to buy more than 3-4 homes since they will pay more in taxes than they are gaining in value.

          • Coreidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            That would be nice. I fear it will never happen tho. The concept of tax the rich sounds good on paper but some how we have to convince rich people to do it.

            Our law makers ARE the rich.

    • Saurok@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just to add to this, it’s not just investment firms. I do title searches for a living and a lot of them are also bought by trusts and IRAs by people living in more well-off areas. It’s basically a retirement plan for them. That should be included in the ban. There basically should be a ban on buying homes you don’t plan on living in or doing significant rehabilitation work to (and with that second stipulation, we should actually inspect and ensure that the house flippers are actually doing much needed work to make the house liveable, not just slapping new paint on the bricks and installing faux shutters to the outside for a quick flip).