• Johanno@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    The risk in that is that those “experts” might have their own interests. For compamies usually

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      And the alternative is having people who don’t know shit about fuck making decisions potentially based on their own interests.

      What’s better?

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Independent experts that at least somehow try to be neutral. And politicians who have to reason their decisions.

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          A couple off the top of my head:

          • Chemical Safety Board (check out their YouTube channel)
          • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
          • National Fire Protection Association

          All are subject matter experts that contribute to laws and policy decisions to varying degrees.

          Edit: National Institute of Health, CDC,

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          So exactly what I said from the get go.