• Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    245
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Minority leader Tim Knopp said:

    we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent

    Give me a fucking break. As a legislator, you have no shortage of ways to dissent including access to media, the ability to speak on the floor of the legislature, and the ability to vote on legislation. What you can’t do, if you want to keep your job is not show up for work every time you know you’re going to lose a vote so that the legislature can’t do business.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      “What about a musician who wants to express a nonpartisan message that young people should participate in our democracy?”

      That’s DIFFERENT she needs to JUST SHUT UP

      • Fester@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “She said she votes for human rights, so we know she votes for the wrong team.”

    • bluemellophone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      10 months ago

      As an Oregon voter, tough shit. We voted with a 68% majority to amend the state constitution, with explicit penalties for legislative absenteeism.

      The chilling impact they are feeling is the will of the people bitch slapping their defunct political strategy.

      • wavebeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        10 months ago

        “But that’s all just Portland voters! All the rest us of didn’t want that!” - My idiot father. Yeah dude, Portland is most of us. Your vote isn’t worth more just because you live around less people.

        • xantoxis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s not even true. There are 3 million registered voters in Oregon, of whom 565k are in Portland (well, Multnomah). While we lean very heavily D, most of the registered D’s in the state are elsewhere.

          • Stern@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            “Portland” is usually used as shorthand for Clackamas/Multnomah/Washington counties, which are about half the states population overall. Shouldn’t be shocking that half the states population does rather heavily influence how the state is run though. Did folks expect Harney county (10,135 sq mi, with 7,515 people) to be the big decider? C’mon now.

            • xantoxis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Surprisingly, even if you include all 3 counties you’re still only about 40% of the registered voters–although you are now at about 50% of the registered D’s. Meaning the rest of the state skews Republican but not by that much.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      10 months ago

      we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent

      What they really said is: Wah! Boohoo! We don’t like consequences for our actions! Wah! Wah!

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      The amendment says a lawmaker is not allowed to run “for the term following the election after the member’s current term is completed.” The senators claimed the amendment meant they could seek another term, since a senator’s term ends in January while elections are held the previous November.

      What a slimey disingenuous BS argument. They are knowingly trying to subvert the law specifically aimed at their behavior while pretending it’s SOMEHOW the will of the voters to ignore them.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    208
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Conservatives supported this rule to punish those who attempted to manipulate sessions by not showing up. When the rule applies to them, they pretend they are victims of some kind.

    The entire time the walk-out was happening, they told the media the rule wouldn’t apply to them and they intended to run again. It was pure arrogance as it happened. And it’s pure arrogance now as they claim their rule shouldn’t apply to them.

    Fuck conservatives. A conservative is incapable of honesty. Every word they utter is deception or manipulation. Every word.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    10 months ago

    The GOP loves whining and not doing their job. These people are being paid to represent people, by wilfully abusing quorum to stall the process they are doing their constituents a major disservice.

    Filibuster if you want to stand there and defend against change you disagree with, but using absence as a political weapon is slimy and low effort.

    • Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      Isn’t that literally what the nazis did? Block decision making by walking out of the Reichstag when they were in the oposition?

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah they also used the term “fake news” to illegitimize opposing news sources just like a specific rotten orange I refuse to name

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh brother…that word is thrown around way too much by both sides…

        • Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Just to clarify, I was not referring to anybody as a Nazi, I simply noted, that the method of blocking votes and using “the system” against itself is not new. And when the methods someone uses have been deployed by the literal original nazis, then I find this noteworthy.

          I agree in general. The term is used as a strong word to clarify someone’s stand point, but besides cheers from within the own bubble and resistance from. The other bubble, nothing happens. The bubbles won’t be dissolved that way. I the end, I think, globally, there is no fight “left VS right” but democrats VS autocrats (not referring to the democratic party here) , and whoever values liberty should stand together against autocrats independently of the party someone prefers.

            • Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I disagree, not because I think they have an agenda which may or may not yield similar results, but because the majority of Republicans aren’t Nazis. They do not want to extend the “Lebensraum” for Germans, they blame and marginalized different minorities and they are not running around in Nazi uniforms (again, the majority). That doesn’t make them in principle any better, but Nazis were as a matter of fact in Europe…

              There have been plenty of autocracies before, during and after Nazi Germany, Nazis were simply the term that stuck. Call them by what they really are: autocrats. They are unable to deny this. If you call them Nazi, the counter argument is obvious: we can’t be Nazis, because we. Didn’t kill millions of people in concentration camps(yet). Calling anybody a Nazi does not fulfill any purpose besides getting applause from people in the same bubble as you’re already in. That’s my point. Feel free to disagree.

    • harry_balzac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The bottom of the barrel, especially with conservatives, is like the TARDIS - impossibly larger on the inside than it appears from the outside.