Players will still need a Battle.net account, however

      • _haha_oh_wow_
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow, I might actually play Overwatch again. Probably not, but maybe…

        • yesdogishere@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Overwatch and all these games being brought to the platform are CRAP. Yuck. Bloated and revolting. So much gfx power and hdd capacity consumed for? CRAP. Hugely inefficient for entertainment dollar.

    • _spiffy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I cannot imagine they would skip the battle.net launcher, but I would love it if they did!

      EDIT: Players using Steam will have access to features of the platform while playing Overwatch 2, such as Steam achievements, their Steam friends list, and the ability to invite them to play in-game.

      Dang this is looking positive.

    • Narrrz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m grudgingly okay with steam launching the apps specific launcher, e. g. Warframe.

      I draw the line at it launching the company’s own game platform. if I wanted the stupid b. net launcher I would fucking have it already, alright?!

        • tal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          another motherfucking program running in the background taking resources (it may not be that much, but it’s still something. And when gaming, every resource counts!)

          Honestly, it should really not be an issue to have a program running. Your computer has plenty of processes running all the time.

          Steam is pretty resource-heavy, but a process shouldn’t need to be.