• Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      So in that scenario we can produce infinite steaks, right?

      Now, people start stealing those steaks because we can produce an infinite amount of them, infinite supply = cost should be zero.

      Now, tell me… What’s the incentive for the steak producer to continue producing those steaks if people aren’t paying for them?

      See where I’m going with that?

      In the end of doesn’t matter if an infinite quantity can be produced “for free”, there’s people behind the product that pay the price and no matter how you want to justify it, if you don’t respect the way the creator wants to give access to their product to people, you have no moral ground to stand on.

      I’m not saying people don’t do it, I’m saying that trying to justify it to make you feel better about it is pure hypocrisy and just wrong.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s objectively untrue due to the case study of what’s actually happening in real life though. You CAN steal as many steaks as you want, and people ARE paying, at least for the good ones. Enough to fund giant companies that produce more steaks.

        if you don’t respect the way the creator wants to give access to their product to people, you have no moral ground to stand on.

        Sometimes the creator is wrong. Monopolies are wrong. Slave labor is wrong. Massive environmental externalities are wrong. In many cases, these things are not illegal, but they should be. Same goes for restrictions on purchases of digital media. It’s wrong, and we shouldn’t respect it. That’s the moral high ground.

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          “Slave labor is wrong” says the guy who doesn’t want to pay for the labor of the people providing him with content.

          If you don’t agree with the way it’s distributed then skip it entirely, that’s the only way you’ve got the moral high ground.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            “Slave labor is wrong” says the guy who doesn’t want to pay for the labor of the people providing him with content.

            Are they providing me with content though? When that media inevitably becomes unusable due to their policies, do I get a refund? Historically, no.

            Which is, by the way, not legal, so producers have neither the moral nor the legal high ground if you think about it. They do have better lawyers though.

            • Kecessa
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Are they providing me with content though?

              I don’t know what you’re pirating if it’s not content created by other people

                • Kecessa
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I don’t think you understand what I meant…

                  People create what you’re pirating, the games, music, movies that you’re illegally downloading have been created by people who need to make a living.

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    But are they providing that to me in exchange for payment. Arguably, no. That’s the point of the meme.