I don’t know if you need this info, but I was pretty disturbed to see unexpected child pornography on a casual community. Thankfully it didn’t take place on SLRPNK.net directly, but if anyone has any advice besides leaving the community in question, let me know. And I wanted to sound an alarm to make sure we have measures in place to guard against this.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    It should be reports and limited to users with some form of track record on the platform. So posted some time earlier, has gotten X likes, account age and similar measures to make sure it is not problematic.

    Downvotes are a bad measure. They are often just done by somebody disagreeing with a post, which often are not exactly a problem. Also 10 is really low, when something really takes off. On the c/meme half the posts have more then 10downvotes, but nothing is really all that bad.

    • mars296@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      The best suggestion I have seen is to have a specific report category for CSAM. If a post is reported for CSAM x number of times, the post is hidden for moderator review. If it is a false report, the mod bans the reporting accounts.

      Another issue is that post links can be edited. Trolls will definitely use this feature for abuse.

      • silence7@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ranking algorithms need to be adjusted so that if a post is removed like this, and then restored, it gets the same number of views it otherwise would have. Without that, a user-interaction driven automatic removal will get abused at scale.

    • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You can see below in this thread herein that someone got >10 downvotes for a perfectly reasonable and civil post by people who merely disagreed with their comment. Automatic censorship would be overly interventionalist. I would not want to participate in a forum that auto-censored like that. Downvotes did their job – pushed the msg low on the page for reduced visibility.