Teachers describe a deterioration in behaviour and attitudes that has proved to be fertile terrain for misogynistic influencers

“As soon as I mention feminism, you can feel the shift in the room; they’re shuffling in their seats.” Mike Nicholson holds workshops with teenage boys about the challenges of impending manhood. Standing up for the sisterhood, it seems, is the last thing on their minds.

When Nicholson says he is a feminist himself, “I can see them look at me, like, ‘I used to like you.’”

Once Nicholson, whose programme is called Progressive Masculinity, unpacks the fact that feminism means equal rights and opportunities for women, many of the boys with whom he works are won over.

“A lot of it is bred from misunderstanding and how the word is smeared,” he says.

But he is battling against what he calls a “dominance-based model” of masculinity. “These old-fashioned, regressive ideas are having a renaissance, through your masculinity influencers – your grifters, like Andrew Tate.”

    • Herbal Gamer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, the definition in the law would have to be based on what constitutes an algorithm. That’s what I meant, doofus

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        What specific algorithms the law applies to does not have to be all pieces of code that could be conceivably classed as an “algorithm”. The law can use a different word if it makes you feel better

        • Herbal Gamer
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Gotcha. Forgot the legal system doesn’t like logical speech lol