President Biden vowed on Monday to veto a House Republican bill that would provide $17.6 billion in aid to Israel, calling it a “cynical political maneuver” intended to hurt the chances of passage for broader legislation that would provide money for Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan and the U.S. border.

House Republicans fiercely oppose the larger bill, which was unveiled by a small, bipartisan group of senators over the weekend. It calls for $118.3 billion in spending and would overhaul some of the nation’s immigration laws to deal with recent surges of migrants at the southern border.

Archive

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    193
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    The president hears the people no longer agree with our stance on Israel

    The president changes his policies to reflect the will of the people

    This is how it’s supposed to work!

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s unfortunate that I have run into people that don’t believe that. I once got called a flipflopper because I commented one stance based on inaccurate information I had, and was given new accurate information which changed my mind.

      People be treating reality like a high school debate club and just sticking with a position because that’s what they choose at the beginning. You can change your mind. Especially if it’s based on new information you didn’t have before.

      • Chocrates@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Right? I knew that Gaza was bad before this conflict but I didn’t have any real information. I then went and educated myself and I have a pretty firm opinion on the subject now which is different than it used to be.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Highschool debate club has failed if that’s what people compare actual debate to. It’s necessary to take a firm stand in a discussion, even being devil’s advocate is fine, as long as it happens objectively.

        But I guess HS debates just end after three rounds and then no retrospective happens about what stance (not WHO) was right and why.

        TL;DR HS debates were supposed to be better than this.

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          To be fair: My high school fuckin’ sucked.

          But also: judged competitions don’t usually see one side agree with the other after hearing their side… That seems like a sure fire way to lose the competition.

          • Randelung@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah during the debate you defend your position, but the retrospective after is lost. The thing that would connect the whole simulation to reality.

    • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thats not what is happening though is it?

      The republicans want to kill funding for Ukraine, humantiarian aid and better protection of jewish and muslim places of worship against US domestic terrorism.

      So they propose a “fund Israel only” bill, that Biden has to veto on and they can cry out against. He still wants the IDF to receive that money though, so they can continue destroying what is left of Gaza and kill and drive out even more people.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nothing, it’s an alternate usage like greentext from 4chan to show a summarized sequence of events that I’m responding to.