balderdash@lemmy.zip to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoOedipus Complexlemmy.zipimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1497arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up1487arrow-down1imageOedipus Complexlemmy.zipbalderdash@lemmy.zip to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square40fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTangent5280@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoJung’s findings have been debunked?
minus-squaredoctorcrimson@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoSee, the only issue with that explanation is that it didn’t really introduce to the reader any of Jung’s contributions or beliefs. But yeah, fuck spiritualists. This Jung guy would have been right at home in a modern Midwifery Association.
minus-squareBondrewd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·1 year agoThis is only 10% of the article dipshit. Some of these points are only theorized to be the case. Also, I find it kind of funny. Scientific method is just a model with its own flaws and is bound to faliure in certain fields as all models do.
minus-squaredudinax@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·1 year agoHow do you debunk a bunch of woo?
Jung’s findings have been debunked?
Removed by mod
Thanks for the explanation.
See, the only issue with that explanation is that it didn’t really introduce to the reader any of Jung’s contributions or beliefs. But yeah, fuck spiritualists. This Jung guy would have been right at home in a modern Midwifery Association.
Removed by mod
This is only 10% of the article dipshit. Some of these points are only theorized to be the case.
Also, I find it kind of funny. Scientific method is just a model with its own flaws and is bound to faliure in certain fields as all models do.
Removed by mod
🤷♀️
Removed by mod
How do you debunk a bunch of woo?
Removed by mod