• OFS_Razgriz@lemmy.worldEnglish
            10·
            2 years ago

            Yes. You can block ads by creating a special script, you can find the info on how to do that at the end of this GitHub ticket but I’ll paste it here too.

            1. Navigate to the uBlock Origin Dashboard (the extension options)

            2. Under the My filters tab add twitch.tv##+js(twitch-videoad).

            3. Under the Settings tab, enable I am an advanced user, then click the cog that appears.

            4. Modify the value of userResourcesLocation from unset to the URL https://github.com/pixeltris/TwitchAdSolutions/raw/master/vaft/vaft-ublock-origin.js

            Then just disable and reenable uBlock to refresh it and you should be good to go.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.deEnglish
        61·
        2 years ago

        Then I won’t use youtube since the content is not really worth watching ads or paying for.

    • HolyDriver@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      2 years ago

      I use adblocker in Firefox mobile. Noticed YouTube keeps downgrading the quality on every video load even tho higher quality is set to auto

  • Furbag@lemmy.worldEnglish
    37·
    2 years ago

    I use uBlock Origin and SponsorBlock for YouTube and I haven’t seen an ad in ages. When I do see an ad, it’s because I’m trying to browse on somebody else’s computer.

    SponsorBlock in particular is life changing. You don’t realize how much nonsense filler is in these videos. You can easily cut a 10 minute video from a mainstream YouTuber down to like 6 or 7 minutes worth of content if you skip intros, skip recaps, skip sponsorships and product plugs, and skip interaction reminders.

      • JohnDClayEnglish
        13·
        2 years ago

        Soon it might be Firefox exclusive though

          • curiosityLynx@kbin.social
            11·
            2 years ago

            I fully abandoned Chromium in favor of Firefox ever since they made extensions like Ghostery work worse (on Chromium, you can only prevent a tracker from running, but it will still get (down)loaded; on Firefox, extensions like Ghostery can prevent a tracker from being loaded at all). It’s been like that for years.

    • SatyrSack@lemmy.oneEnglish
      4·
      2 years ago

      I get a lot of videos with a Spanish audio track and no way to change it to default.

  • dog@yiffit.netEnglish
    31·
    2 years ago

    reddit and youtube really shouting out how much companies don’t give two farts about its users. there’s so much wholesome and educational content on youtube but, dogs forbid, youtube make $5 fewer in revenue than yesterday 🙄 i can’t wait for grassroots decentralization of the internet, including video

    • Striker@lemmy.worldOPMEnglish
      24·
      2 years ago

      Youtube has been consistently getting worse for the past 10 years now. I keep going back because that’s where all the good content is and I don’t think anyone could possibly create an alternative. It would just cost too much money.

      • dog@yiffit.netEnglish
        5·
        2 years ago

        idk, some of my fellow tech furries have ridiculously large homelabs and servers that have massive amounts of storage. i don’t think it’s impossible, but may require someone to come up with a way for us to decentralize video which, ofc, is humungo-bonzonga-jumbo

        • RoyRogersMcFreely@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
          14·
          2 years ago

          What’s missing is a monetization strategy. Any social media platform at a scale larger than a small community is going to require some kind of revenue because servers in the basement just aren’t going to cut it for long.

          Users might not like ads, but until they are willing to pay for subscriptions, that’s what they’re stuck with.

          I wonder what percentage of Lemmy. World users have actually donated. Hopefully it’s sustainable enough that they can do more than pay for servers, but also hire some admins.

          • dog@yiffit.netEnglish
            6·
            2 years ago

            true, true, and true. i didn’t even think about admins. just as important D:

        • EpsilonRose@kbin.social
          6·
          2 years ago

          The technical aspects, like storage and bandwidth aren’t the only issues (though they are pretty major hurdles). The, arguably, bigger problem is the network effect. If you have the best UX possible and no content creators (that people care about), you won’t get users and without users you won’t get content creators that people care about.

          • TheAngryBad@kbin.social
            3·
            2 years ago

            If you have the best UX possible and no content creators (that people care about), you won’t get users and without users you won’t get content creators that people care about.

            This. I have a small yt channel, my videos regularly get 10k+ views there. In the early days, I also uploaded to a couple of other sites (dailymotion was one, can’t remember the other). Where I was getting hundreds if not thousands of views on yt, I was getting maybe half a dozen on the other sites. My most popular video got nearly 100k views on yt, and last I looked on dailymotion it had something like 8 views. Needless to say, I didn’t bother uploading to other sites after that and just stayed on yt.

            That said, I’m willing to start uploading to peertube once I’ve had a chance to look into it.

          • dog@yiffit.netEnglish
            2·
            2 years ago

            oh, of course, you’re absolutely right. it may take another rancid campaign from youtube parallel to reddit’s shenanigans that fill in the ux piece of it. or, who knows, maybe it would grow organically as people start to see their favorite sites and resources always come with a peephole and a coin slot 🙃

        • franzfurdinand@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          2 years ago

          One thing I’m curious about… Are you aware of a way to grab an entire channel worth of videos at once? I have a few educational channels I’d like to have mirrored locally just for my own consumption.

              • Kresten@feddit.dkEnglish
                1·
                2 years ago

                No worries, just wanted to spread the word of it being back. Only realized it myself recently

          • dog@yiffit.netEnglish
            3·
            2 years ago

            i think kresten has the right idea, i’ve heard good things about youtube-dl

    • Eggyhead@kbin.social
      7·
      2 years ago

      We are the commodity for sale to advertisers. We make the content we consume, YouTube makes sure it keeps going, but for the most part they are just perpetuating viewing space for ads.

      • dog@yiffit.netEnglish
        4·
        2 years ago

        this, of course, is not inherently bad. but when does it end? when you literally strip away all but 1 cubic centimeter of joy and ease of use of your product just to squeeze out two monies?

  • SrootusEnglish
    30·
    2 years ago

    Christ I love the Revanced project

    • TheFreed@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      2 years ago

      There’s a Revanced? I’ve been clinging on to Vanced hoping YouTube API will not change anytime soon

      • SrootusEnglish
        3·
        2 years ago

        Yes, instead of an app you install, you patch the app yourself using a separate app. Kinda like xmanager if you’ve used that before. I’d point you to their official reddit, but… yknow… Here’s their official Discord https://discord.gg/revanced

        • kofe@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          2 years ago

          Dude I had vanced and it died after YouTube got them to stop updating. You’re saying it’s still going!?

          • SrootusEnglish
            6·
            2 years ago

            As far as I know, not the same team, at least officially. Unlike vanced, they don’t provide the app themselves, you have to build it yourself, but that isn’t too hard. Your given the patches and the app that writes them patches to a stock version of YouTube downloaded on APKMirror, all that plus vanced MicroG and you got Revanced

            • kofe@lemmy.worldEnglish
              3·
              2 years ago

              That’s awesome, I’ll definitely check it out! I’m not the most tech savvy but am up for learning:) thanks!

  • Aer@lemmy.worldMEnglish
    271·
    2 years ago

    They really want to tv-ify web content huh? People left TV because they were sick of ads.

    I only have YouTube premium because I do not want a TV license and one is definitely cheaper than the other but the fuck man.

    • twack@lemmy.worldEnglish
      15·
      2 years ago

      Cable TV did not originally have ads. That was part of the reason that people started paying for it.

      What you are seeing is the natural cycle of content and greed.

    • wildeaboutoskar@lemmy.worldEnglish
      8·
      2 years ago

      Not just them either. Netflix has an ad based tier now and I wouldn’t be surprised if other platforms have them too as they realise there’s a limit to how much they can realistically charge people. It seems like we’ve circled back to the start of cable

      • hodgepodge@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 years ago

        Yeah i am totally fine with being showed ads or paying for an ad free option. I got YouTube red when it came out and never looked back. Plus they gave us Cobra Kai, which was amazing. I do wish they also included a “we won’t sell your data” option in that premium though

      • wabafee@lemmy.worldEnglish
        9·
        2 years ago

        Aside from Peertube one I could think of is vimeo, dailymotion, dtube and twitch, then again in terms of content and servers available around the world nothing matching youtube, except maybe tiktok and twitch. There is pornhub which I think could be the best competitor for youtube barely any restrictions you can talk shit in fact some actually upload gaming videos and some random stuff aside from porn ofcourse they have a lot of servers around the world. The videos dont buffer that much. Who ever owns pornhub if they decide to have sfw alternative to it they could be best alternative to youtube.

        Edit: I think they dont have sfw because its hard to make money out of it similar to youtube which is operating at a loss. The only reason google still keeps youtube running is because its a white elephant.

      • dan@upvote.auEnglish
        5·
        2 years ago

        Right now, there’s no viable alternative anywhere near YouTube’s size. Hosting that much video content is expensive and very few companies have sufficient money and servers to support it.

  • Daniel Retana@mastodon.ie
    18·
    2 years ago

    @STRIKINGdebate2 Firefox + uBlock Origin is love!!!
    Firefox + uBlock Origin is life!!!

    Also on Android. It allows me to have extensions.
    I don’t need any other app besides Firefox, Revanced, and my bank’s app on my phone.

  • jennwiththesea@lemmy.worldEnglish
    17·
    2 years ago

    I finally got a Nebula subscription. A lot of my YouTube favorites are on there, and I’ve found a couple new ones to follow. I still wind up on YT for a few folks, but that number is dropping.

  • dill@lemmy.oneEnglish
    151·
    2 years ago

    That’s wild. I would never sit through that. I’ve been a YouTube premium sub for years because it’s bundled with music. Never knew it was this bad

    • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
      101·
      2 years ago

      Careful, lots of people take issue with paying for a service these days. /s but only kinda

      YT premium has been by far the most worth it subscription for me. I spend a frankly unhealthy amount of YT, even have it running in the background while not watching actively, and I listen to YT music for hours every day. Really easy value sell for me.

      But somehow people expect YT to host and deliver literal exabytes of data for free.

      • deaconblue@kbin.social
        6·
        2 years ago

        These kind of unsolicited reports from users prove a really important point, and one that Spez and company would prefer to ignore. If you have good enough content people will pay for an ad-free experience.