• Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I think they want to compete with GNU/Linux and attract its users. They made WSL for probably the same reason. They even have a terminal now that almost doesn’t suck.

      • SauceFlexr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Windows terminal is now my preferred terminal. I use it on a daily basis at work, and adding in WSL just makes things easier in general for Windows. My google search history is no longer Powershell eqicalent for X in linux.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well I’m glad it works for you. Also I don’t think it runs under wine so you are stuck on Windows.

      • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, when I used it, every command had like a second of delay. It was also buggy. But it has tabs and you can even split the window into multiple panes. So big improvement over cmd.

        • BenPranklin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          How long ago did you try it? I gave the first iteration of wsl a chance and had the same experience, it was super slow especially for things like ls. Its a lot better since wsl2. Probably 90% or more the performance of bare metal install of linux

    • darcy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      wsl is good for when ure forced to use windows